Interpret

Figure 3.24 Dependent T-test | symbolise| N| Std. divergence| Std. improper conduct Mean| cope with 1| Eadherencelevel| 4.6833| 30| 1.79190| .32716| postEadh| 6.5167| 30| 1.18164| .21574| duo 2| Cadherencelevel| 4.4583| 30| 1.67265| .30538| postCadh| 5.1417| 30| 1.38298| .25250| | | | | | | | opposeed discrepancys| | | | | | Mean| Std. Deviation| Std. shift Mean| 95% Confidence musical interval of the Difference| | t| df| Sig. (2-tailed)| | | | | Lower| Upper| | | | | Pair 1| Eadherencelevel| -1.83333| 1.74610| .31879| -2.48534| -1.18133| -5.751| 29| .000| | postEadh| | | | | | | | Pair 2| Cadherencelevel| -.68337| 1.25073| .22835| -1.15040| -.21634| -2.993| 29| .006| | postCadh| | | | | | | | | | | | | The Sig. (2- tailed) value in this paired model test is 0.000. This value is less than .05. For of this, it do-nothing be concluded that theres significant dispute amid the adherence levels of experimental group who was trustn medicatio n updates by text messages and telephone calls and set mobile calendar alarms from the give group who was not given an updates regarding their medications. 25 Independent T-test | Groups| N| Mean| Std. Deviation| Std. computer error Mean| Posttest| A| 30| 5.1417| 1.

38298| .25250| | B| 30| 6.5167| 1.18164| .21574| | | | | | | | Paired Differences| | | | | | Mean| Std. Deviation| Std. Error Mean| 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference| | t| df| Sig. (2-tailed)| | | | | Lower| Upper| | | | | Pair 1| Eadherencelevel| -1.83333| 1.74610| .31879| -2.48534| -1.18133| -5.751| 29| .000| | postEadh| | | | | | | | Pair 2| Cadherencelevel| -.68337| 1.25073| .22835| -! 1.15040| -.21634| -2.993| 29| .006| | postCadh| | | | | | | | The Sig. (2- tailed) value in this paired exemplification test is 0.000. This value is less than .05. For of...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay